The scheduled retrial for Roman Storm, a developer associated with the Tornado Cash protocol, has been officially rescheduled to April 2027. The updated timeline follows recent judicial review and reflects adjustments to the case calendar based on pending defensive filings and procedural requirements.
The scheduling change stems from the outcome of the initial hearing conducted last year. During that proceeding, a federal jury examined multiple accusations brought against the defendant. Jurors ultimately reached a partial resolution, convicting Storm on a single count related to money transmitting regulations. However, the panel was unable to achieve unanimity on several additional allegations, resulting in a hung verdict on those remaining charges.
Presiding Judge Katherine Polk Failla formally adjourned the upcoming trial session to address outstanding legal motions filed by the defense. The postponement directly corresponds to a submission requesting a complete acquittal on the unresolved counts, alongside a separate application seeking a formal continuance to allow additional preparation time. These filings prompted the court to pause the calendar rather than proceed with witness preparations or juror selection at the originally anticipated interval.
In federal criminal proceedings, when a jury delivers a conviction on some charges but remains divided on others, the undecided allegations must undergo fresh adjudication. Courts routinely suspend pretrial timelines to ensure dispositive motions receive comprehensive judicial review. By deferring the hearing schedule, the bench guarantees that any requests to dismiss the remaining accusations are thoroughly evaluated before the prosecution resumes building its case or secondary witnesses are subpoenaed.
The extended timeline establishes a structured pathway for the next phase of litigation. Once the court reviews the pending acquittal request and issues a definitive ruling on the motion, any subsequent proceedings will operate under the newly established April 2027 framework. The adjustment reflects standard judicial management of complex regulatory cases, providing clear procedural milestones while accommodating necessary defensive preparations ahead of any potential resumed trial sessions.